Talk:Adil Kamil Abdullah Al Wadi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Start

This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This page doesn't sound very encyclopediac to me-- it's choppy and is mostly composed of bullet points rather than proper paragraphs. I'm considering adding

This article or section is not written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article.
Please improve it or discuss changes on the talk page. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions.

to the top of the page. +JeffKo427 10:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bullet point?

The allegations in the summary of evidence memos were always written in the bullet point format you are concerned about. Did you go to page 30 of his unclassified CSRT dossier? The allegations are a direct quote.

The factors are not a direct quote. A different, more extended Summary of Evidence was read out during his Administrative Review Board, That document has not yet been released. But it was read out loud, during his hearing. The bullet points are a paraphrase of the portion of the points in his 2nd Summary of Evidence memo which were read out loud. They were points in the original. Why shouldn't they be in point form in the paraphrase?

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 22:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)