Talk:Aircraft noise
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I propose this article is moved to Aircraft noise. It's not aviation that makes the noise, it's the aircraft! Renaming will help people locate the article in a search - besides, no-one I know refers to it as aviation noise. GRAHAMUK 11:21, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Agree
I woudl agree with the aforementioned comment
Agree --Hooperbloob 04:13, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Agree - Adrian Pingstone 15:15, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Agree. There's also Car noise. GregorB 21:02, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
strongly agree' --the entire body of scientific and popular literature on this subject uses the term "aircraft noise"....also this article needs a lot of work with references, discussion of standards and mitigation programs...i will do some of this Anlace 18:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
i have made this change with the concurrence above...Anlace 23:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Enroute noise bad too
Somebody please mention that even after planes have reached cruising altitude, they are still noisy, at least to countryside dwellers. They ought to move those routes to go over the ocean more. E.g., see my http://jidanni.org/comm/air/m750/index_en.html --jidanni 2/06
- i shall try to address this jidanni, thanks for the mention of an important concept Anlace 23:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- issue has been attended to with a discussion under health effects. Noise health effects generally embraces annoyance issues. cheers Anlace 06:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Picture of aircraft
I think this is an appropriate pic as it shows how near planes get to the houses and gives an idea of how noisy it must be in those houses.--Light current 01:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Noise levels
Cant just say 113 dB. We must define exactly the level. Is it a a SPL of 113 dB rel to 1mw? At what distance would this SPL be measured?--Light current 23:57, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fix
Seems to be disorganized. The section on Sonic Boom is empty, and the page has numerous formatting errors.
[edit] Floating airports
This material should be stricken in entirety. It is not a realistic or well supported scheme. If no citation to the contrary can be advanced, it needs to be eliminated rapidly as it distorts reality of present day economics. Anlace 04:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)