From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88685/886859e3ad57fa04f46d474ff52889dc9b1bc493" alt="" |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
|
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
|
|
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses. |
I would like to know why the category Assyria is allowed while category Kurdistan is being removed? Is there exact boundaries for Assyria? As far as I remember that's the main reason given for removing the Kurdistan category. Heja Helweda 22:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Qamishli belongs to Assyria
Heja, Wikipedia's goal is to tell the truth. Not political made up rubbish. Those are the rules of Wikipedia. Qamishli belongs to Assyria. The present Syrian Arab presence is only occupation. This is a truth all scholars are agree about. Qamishli don't belong to Kurdistan, neither now or in history. //Alfa.
Is the name Qamishli or Al Qamishli? Just curious because of the photo in the article. Baristarim 05:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Al Qamishli. Move in progress. Thank you! - Anas Talk? 12:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- I requested it to be moved in WP:RM. The Al Qamishli space is occupied. - Anas Talk? 12:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Once moved, do you then want Qamishli to redirect to Al Qamishli, or is that not necessary? Bubba hotep 12:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've performed the move as requested. Just let me know if you still want the Qamishli redirect in there still. :) Bubba hotep 12:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Yes, It would be appropriate to leave it as a redirect page, just as it is now. Thanks Bubba! :-) - Anas talk? 12:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)