Talk:Angular mil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Use of mils by the US Navy
The phrase:
- armies use metric units for mapping and targetting, even the U.S. Army.
was changed to:
- armies use metric units for mapping and targeting, even the U.S. Army, but the U.S. Navy does not.
The sentence is talking about army use, so I don't think navy use belongs in the same sentence. The mil is used within the US Navy at least as follows:
- by the USMC just like the US Army
- by the US Navy for fire support of land operations
Bobblewik 12:51, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
- The point wasn't about the use of mils; it was about the use of yards. And, more specifically, the old claim was that English units in general are no longer ever used with mils. I claim that is false. Gene Nygaard 12:54, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
- In other words, the problem dealt with the clausefor which what you have quoted above was an explanation and justification, namely:
- No conversion to Imperial units is provided because [rest of sentence above in first quoted text, removed from second].
- Gene Nygaard 13:09, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- I just get it. Thanks. I had been misreading it as armies use mils rather than armies use metric units. Now I think that the whole sentence should be taken out. Bobblewik 13:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Okay by me. Gene Nygaard 13:26, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Note that if it were converted, "1 mil at 1 km is about 1 metre" it should be "1 mil at 1,000 yards is about 1 yard". Not really necessary, I don't think, and not needing an explanation why it isn't there. Gene Nygaard 13:29, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Thanks. Copy edited as discussed. Bobblewik 13:45, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
