From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Ageo020 21:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
|
Getting Started
|
|
Getting your info out there
|
|
Getting more Wikipedia rules
|
|
|
Getting Help
|
|
Getting along
|
|
Getting technical
|
|
|
|
--Ageo020 21:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90a6f/90a6fa7aaf696dd38c65b169c1efc527a593dba6" alt="" |
Welcome to Wikipedia. I see you have been experimenting by your latest edit but this was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more. Please note that continued unhelpful edits may even result in your account being blocked. Thanks. Glen 10:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
|
- I will NOT be silenced by your arrogant bullying! I will not yield; I will not back down! --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 20:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Just remember to keep WP:NPOV in mind; when people point things out, [1], they are not "bullying" you, but trying to help you become familiar with some of the policies and guidelines. AuburnPilotTalk 21:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC) originally posted in Talk:George W. Bush#Torture
- I can not be helped by calling my statements "experimenting" and "unhelpful", and saying that I should basically keep my comments to the sandbox. I can not consider those statements to be anything less than an insult. If the comment was regarding the main article itself I would have accepted the criticism, but it was posted with regard to what I said on the talk page and instead of challenging me, on any particular point of my statements, just boldfaced rejected everything I said. The initial comments may not have been intended to be insults, but they have resulted in that. Relations are further strained when I am threatened. Bullying involves the use of threats and insults, that is how I have come to view the comment as an initial act of bullying. My initial reaction was to strong with the CAP LOCKS and "!"'s, but I still consider it to be bullying. Thanks either way for trying to calm me down, but I was already calm and (almost) regretting my strongly worded statement by the time I read your post. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 01:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GOOFY EDIT SUMMARY
Just because the edit summary is SUPER EXCEPTIONALLY SENSATIONAL doesn't mean that the underlying content is a very serious matter, at least it gave me a good laugh. But why didn't they revert my edit to Q, did they just assume that is how trek fans talk, I ought to be insulted, all trek fans ought to be insulted. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 09:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- There we go! --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 05:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)