Talk:Anthony Parnes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
when editing, it is always wise to lrn a ltl abt the subject 1st and nt rely on guesswork or sbjective impression. thanx. Jamaissur
- Whole words would be appreciated. You're not text-messaging. SlimVirgin (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- Please put your source here. I have looked online but can't find one that is reputable. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Also, please note that if you revert again, you will have violated 3RR. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- i wld lk an apology 4 yr deliberate harassment of me via yr wilful ignorance of the Guinness affair. anyone who knows anything abt it knws that the 'guinness 4' consisted of 3 mmbrs of the jewish-brit. cmnty (inc. parnes) and 1 man with a jewish father (ernest saunders). this is common knwlg amg businessppl, jewish and non-jewish alike and the observer stated it explicitly in the quote i used, wch u hv ignored. Jamaissur
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- it's me who supposed to be on medication. if it's an iq test, i fail -- i'm distracted by the pain in my knuckles after a long walk. if it's meaningless, i gt the mssg. Jamaissur
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The medication doesn't seem to interfere at all with your careful copy-editing of articles on infamous Holocaust deniers: [1] Nor does it seem to interfere when you copyedit the articles on, create re-directs for, and copyedit and add to List of British Jews yet another British Jew who has been convicted of crime, [2] [3] [4], which is apparently your only purpose for editing Wikipedia. No, the issue of communicating effectively in English only seems to manifest itself on Talk: pages; why is that, I wonder? Jayjg (talk) 16:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- because talk pages r informal and 1 does not aim 4 the highest possibel standrads. standards u and the rest of the gang hv msrbly failed 2 achieve on the irving article. 2 much time spent heresy-hunting, no dbt.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- which is apparently your only purpose for editing Wikipedia
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- it's a neglected area 4 sm reason. also, i help u by improving the article on
mein fuehrirving, not him.
- it's a neglected area 4 sm reason. also, i help u by improving the article on
-
-
-
-
-
-