Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Lincoln (sex act)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. John Wilkes Booth 19:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Abraham Lincoln (sex act)
Nonnotable, possibly totally invented sexual act. Found only one google reference, on urbandictionary. I don't think this quite qualifies for Speedy Delete. -- dcclark (talk) 23:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I did not realise the rarity of this act but understand possible concerns as to its relevance. Whilst non-invented, it holds more of an urban myth role, and I included it simply for definition purposes. -- shorglin (talk) 24:27, 7 July 2006 (GMT)
- Delete per nom. Dicdef. Tevildo 23:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, pornographic--Anthony.bradbury 23:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: While I support deletion, I don't believe that pornographic content is a sufficient reason to do so. The nonnotability is key here. -- dcclark (talk) 23:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Just want to second dcclark's point. We should welcome articles about pornography, or other sexual matters, provided they meet the criteria for articles in general. Tevildo 23:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, pornographic--Anthony.bradbury 23:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete urbdicdef ~ trialsanderrors 23:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 23:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom totally invented nn notable, looks speedy.--John Lake 01:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 01:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable. I mean this isn't the Cleveland steamer or anything. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 02:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Larry V (talk | contribs) 04:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Guinnog 21:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The description is actually the David Copperfield. (fake ejaculation for surprise to the face) 72.150.55.60 21:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Landolitan 12:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
