From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Bruce Haslingden (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
- delete - 74th in a single Olympic event seems doubtful notability - Tiswas(t/c) 00:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- delete- Unless there's some other significance to this person's life which has not been adequately expressed on the page (and why wouldn't it be?) ParvatiBai 00:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No third-party sources. Abeg92contribs 00:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. Aren't all Olympians inherently notable? Eddie.willers 01:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- deleteGman124 01:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Wow 74th. He needed one big Act of God--ZayZayEM 02:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't appear to be notable from what's stated. Hello32020 02:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete for failing WP:BIO ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 02:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sure, Olympians have inherent notability, but 74th? I think not. HornandsoccerTalk 03:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Being selected to represent Australia at the Olympics is a sufficient proof of notability. WP:BIO lists as one of its criteria: "Competitors who have played or competed at the highest level in amateur sports." Placing 74th does not take away from that accomplishment. --Eastmain 03:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Eastmain. --Evan Seeds (talk)(contrib.) 03:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Eddie 'the Eagle' Edwards lost badly at the Olympics. But he also became well-known and had some semblance of fame. Does the subject? ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 04:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep per WP:BIO Orderinchaos 05:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep per WP:BIO and precedent of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lecomte. In the case of Lecomte, an Olympic athlete's article was kept merely because he was an Olympic athlete, even though not even his first name was known. --Metropolitan90 06:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
