Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epsilon 96
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 (talk) 02:35, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Epsilon 96
Appears to be advertising a work in progress, almost certain vanity. Rje 00:47, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Chokozilla We should delete the article for not being clear enough. However, I have a message for the person who posted it: When you have worked some more on Epsilon 96, you are welcome to try making the article once again. All you need to go on is to show some professionalism. For the time being, delete.
- Delete. According to the page this article links to, this is the creation of a 16-year-old. Latest entry (14 August) confesses that he has "not really worked on anything e96 related for awile [sic] now, But I just can't motivate myself that easily." If the creator can't interest himself about this, then why should we feel it's notable? (Yeah, I wrote a bad word, but to call this "vanity" implies the author actually cares -- & he admits that he doesn't.) -- llywrch 01:02, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per llywrch. Flowerparty talk 01:03, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Hamster Sandwich 01:16, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Cruuuuuuuft. Karmafist 03:01, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete . vanity ≈ jossi ≈ 03:27, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete "Out, damned spot! out, I say!" --Agamemnon2 10:35, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Totally nn. --Lomedae 12:22, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 19:15, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete--even if this was not advertising, and was an attempt at creating an artical about something that the writer considered noteworthy, it is obscure enough(and a stub to boot) that it is a good canadate for deletion anyway.
--1 black hand 22:02, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
