Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalanidhi Maran
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-08 21:58Z
[edit] Kalanidhi Maran
non notable advertising. db tag has been removed twice, so on to afd Nardman1 09:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- also Kalanidhimaran if this isn't proof this is just pure spam, I don't know what is. Nardman1 10:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Speedy Deletenon-notable, db-spam/ad AND could be self-promotion (since names are not provided on WP) Tuvok^Talk|Desk|Contribs 10:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)- Keep - passes WP:BIO, though could do with a rewrite. See, e.g. [1], [2] and [3]. MER-C 10:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Copied from [4]: "Please donot delete this article.this is an artcile about a business man pionner of indian private tv channels. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Soleswaran (talk • contribs)." I guess that's a Keep vote from the author of the articles. Nardman1 10:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, thanks to MER-C I'll vote the same. (the sources looked good to me as well when I checked them) Mathmo Talk 11:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Not notable. Anwar 12:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. He is quite notable and meets the primary criteron of WP:N as per the references cited by MER-C. Needs a rewrite though... Ccscott 16:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Deleteunless properly sourced and referenced by end of this AfD Alf photoman 17:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- * Keep, additional sources should suffice [WP:BIO], needs additional work though Alf photoman 15:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete- non-notable. Turgidson 18:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I added references to teh article. --Eastmain 02:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep References supplied do establish notability. --Oakshade 03:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, highly notable media personality. --Soman 10:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
