Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Corbett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro 05:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Luke Corbett
Tagged for speedy deletion as vanity, but it asserts he plays semi-professionally for Gloucester City so he is of interest to fans of the the team and should be kept in my opinion. YMMV Kappa 22:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yep he does Keep (mind you, you have to search for the bugger, he isnt mentioned on Gloucesters official website!!) Jcuk 00:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Template and expand. The creator, Joycie 15, appears to be an inexperienced newbie. Someone from the Welcoming Committee should really explain the point and purpose of WP to them. If this footballer is not of note, delete. -- (aeropagitica)
01:01, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete not notable.Gator (talk) 13:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I don't really think semi-profesisonal football players for a non-league team is notable really. FredOrAlive 00:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:BIO on account of his time at fully professional Cheltenham Town. Choalbaton 02:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I have expanded this player stub to provide more biographical information, appearance and goal detail, complete with sources. Dave Hatton 01:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, notability confirmed. Christopher Parham (talk) 01:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - he's played in the Football League, and he helps fill the Cheltenham Town players category. ArtVandelay13 10:27, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.