Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make Penis Fast
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Description of spam text, not particularly interesting or informative. Fuzheado 01:13, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - someone trying to increase hits on a web page... my guess - Texture 02:49, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Delete - that doesn't deserve to be in an ecyclopedia.Keep - Initially, I thought it was something made up, but it exists on Google.TheBam 03:13, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)- Keep. I don't see why it doesn't deserve to be here. It would be less interesting and less informative if it were gone. Everyking 06:17, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Comment - this is just a joke. Is it a notable joke, or an obscure one? I've never heard of it before. Average Earthman 12:17, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. <yawn> Bad enough getting spam like this </yawn> in email. I guess it was inevitable it would start here too. No evidence in the article that it's a notable joke, it's just a rather obvious joke with wings because it appeals strongly to a few, including the anon who posted it here. On the Internet that's all it takes. Andrewa 19:43, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Taku 05:34, Mar 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete -- Cyrius | (talk) 06:28, Mar 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. --pne 16:20, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not sure why this wasn't deleted immediately upon its creation. Moncrief 04:22, Mar 31, 2004 (UTC)
- Whether or not you believe this is worthy of keeping, it's clearly not worthy of speedy deletion. Is it nonsense or known to be false? I vote keep, btw. Meelar 03:32, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - ;Bear 00:19, 2004 Apr 2 (UTC)
- Keep. Mkweise 14:50, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Note also that the article has been substantially improved since most of the "delete" votes above were cast. Look at the current version and reconsider your votes. Mkweise 15:55, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: Agree it has improved, from being spectacularly substandard to being simply substandard. None of the changes change my vote or the arguments that support it I'm afraid. And I would expect my vote above to still count without this comment. This may not be an ideal process, but it's the process as I understand it. Andrewa 10:00, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I've never heard of it, and to be honest, it seems quite stupid. PMC 20:27, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. It's informative on the subject at hand, whether you consider that subject worthy of your personal perusal or not. prat 00:57, 2004 Apr 6 (UTC)
- Joke neither very famous nor funny. Delete, or replace with serious information about how to make penis fast. +sj+ 05:00, 2004 Apr 6 (UTC)
- No, no! The proper title for that would be Penis acceleration. Mkweise 15:50, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
