Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RCMB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. As a general rule, I discount any and all IP address votes, and they made up every single KEEP vote without exception. Therefore, DELETE was the consensus. Mo0[talk] 16:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RCMB

ATTENTION! If you came here because someome tolded you to, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page or group of pages is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp [optional]}}

NN website / fansite. -- Longhair 07:48, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete -- Longhair 07:48, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable web forum. Took too long to even figure out what the subject was. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-13 09:13Z
• Excellent forum full of outstanding individuals. I mean that, I really do. (unsigned vandalism from 65.216.70.62)
• Very informative and acurate article... Who is that atractive man eating the Cheeseburger? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.80.10.154 (talk • contribs). -- Longhair 21:43, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• A great source for Melissa T photos and related information, occasionally MSU sports may be discussed.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.159.115.154 (talk • contribs). -- Longhair 21:43, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• A place where 19 year old kids are verbally abused and people are encouraged to push aside people standing in doorways. Keep it!!
• as far as collge website blogs go this one is the best. you should keep it in wiki
• keep it people. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Slicknickshady (talk • contribs). -- Longhair 21:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As written, completely unencyclopedic. If someone wants to rewrite it so it's not vanityfanspamvertisementcruft, I'll reconsider my vote. FCYTravis 20:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep from kosmo!
  • Oh noes someone on teh Intarweb called me an asshole. Whatever shall I do? FCYTravis 22:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep In the RCMB's defense, there can be found hundreds of informational pages. If you are looking to build a Pergola Arbor, there is a page dedicated to it's construction. Deciding whether to buy the new XBOX360 or wait for the PS3? You can find several pages on that subject. Looking to learn to homebrew? You can find a thread dedicated to learning this hobby as well. Wondering about mortgage rates or legal questions? There are dozens of experts on the RCMB who can answer your questions. There are tons more examples. Please reconsider your deletion. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.72.66.100 (talk • contribs). -- Longhair 21:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non notable website.Obina 22:02, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. --InShaneee 22:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Completely unreadable summation. Not a notable website and not a real "forum".
• Delete Far too many pics of Spartan Al. Very hard on the eyes. Wikipedia should not make you want to hurl.
• Delete per nomination. Durova 22:54, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ashibaka tock 04:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

The reason why this entry should be kept is simply because it represents an emerging internet forum desperate for definition and recognition. The Red Cedar Mesage Board is not a "fan site" per se - it is a very unique online forum where thousands of people come each day to discuss various issues ranging from Michigan State University athletics to politics and other topics of general interest. With all due respect to the editors of Wikipedia, if the RCMB is permitted to remain on your dynamic online encyclopedia then many more, perhaps more significant, entries will be made regarding the RCMB and the true importance of the definition will be more clear. Please be patient. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Tuff gHost (talk • contribs) 00:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete potential future notability is not sufficient for inclusion in wikipedia -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:58, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

• So you have a page dedicated to blumpkins, but the RCMB must go? Sounds like a solid decision. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.187.152.106 (talk • contribs).

• Delete Per nom. Ohnoitsjamie_talk^contribs 07:44, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete as non-notable forum, influenced by masses of ballot stuffing and meatpuppets. And the images are unknown copyright status to boot. Stifle 01:40, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.