Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow kiss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Article is blank now anyway. W.marsh 18:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rainbow kiss
Original research, not notable slang term Alex Bakharev 00:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Maybe see Rainbow Party for context? Abeg92contribs 00:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - not a notable term for sexual activity; per WP:NEO --Haemo 00:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Do not redirect to Rainbow Party, only the second definition fits this and it's even less notable. --Dhartung | Talk 00:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable, probable OR, and as per WP:NEO. Darthgriz98 00:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable Mukadderat 02:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 04:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Don't redirect to rainbow party. Thats come nasty shit.--M8v2 05:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete If it belongs anywhere, it belongs in a dictionary of slang. DoorsAjar 06:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom.--Phill talk Edits 09:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom., WP:NEO, WP:N. Scienter 16:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Maybe add WP:CFSD to the above list. If I would have been on NP at the time, I would have just put a db-nonsense on it. BlackBear 17:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
