Talk:Asia Argento
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Documentary about her father?
Anyone know the title? Шизомби 04:50, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've never heard of it despite being a fan of both father and daughter for many years, and IMDb doesn't list it under her credits. The only source I can find for it existing is the IMDb bio by "anonymous" - the article here seems to be one of many parroting that. Pearce.duncan 05:09, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
She currently endorses Miss Sixty
[edit] Whoa! Jeez.
I don't know about you guys, but I wasn't expecting a large image of full-frontal nudity when I came to this article from Land of the Dead. Now, I'm no prude, and Ms. Argento's a beauty, but my Mom could have very easily been in the room when that happened. Isn't there a photo more appropriate for a simple bio page? Max22 03:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- No.
-
- As it is stated at WP:IUP: "Do not upload shocking or explicit pictures, unless they have been approved by a consensus of editors for the relevant article." The nude image has no relevance to the article and clearly because of the constant reverting, has not been approved by a consensus of editors. The image also has no copyright information and should be deleted by an administrator soon. So stop reverting to that nude image. -Lindsey8417 09:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Official website down
www.asiargento.it is temporarily or permenantly down, needing re-registering. Will write a bracketed note next to link? or is there an other way to do this? Book M 12:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well spotted. Domain had expired, although checking the whois details now, it shows its registered until "20071021". I guess it'll be back online soon, you could just add "temporarily offline" next to the link, I've seen that before on Wikipedia. —B33R Talk • Contribs 14:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pictures
I want to post the below pictures on her site, if anyone has any objections speak now or forever hold your peace
[edit] "erotic" link
Really, this kind of thing represents the worst wikipedia has to offer. Linking common words, rather than to more context-specific content? Does "erotic" really need a link to the general page on the word? Come on. Why not link Rome, then. ... YOU LINKED "ROME"! ? ! Seriously, why not link every word?