Talk:Bartimaeus Trilogy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cleaned up the formatting of the article a bit. Also added more information on individual books in the series siddharth 10:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Biased
This entire section about the characters is completely biased. Whoever wrote this just wrote the whole thing in their POV.
I agree. Especially about Bartimaeus being a comic relief. Being sarcastic and witty doesn't make you a comic relief.
- He's not a comic relief at all. Though his comments can be really funny, his parts are just as serious as Nathaniel's or Kitty's. Starla Dear 02:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe we could say he provides comic relief. Jamhaw 19:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)jamhaw
[edit] Incorrect
I'm constantly having to correct the part on golem's. A golem isn't a spirit like a djinni or a foliot, its an object animated by magic, it has no mind of its own and is powered by a force opposite to that of the spirits in the book. Its human, not demonic magic.
[edit] Real History
Notice that the English civil war had happened and later wizards seized power also the Holy Roman Emipire never fell making me think that someone in the empire enlisted demons during the thirty years war and also technology appears not to have advanced as far ironclads are the best ships they have but the wisards have got jets.
[edit] OMFG!!!
So many of the characters listed are unimportant, only main and major antagonists and protagonists are to be shown not character who existed for 3 chapters!!! I'm deleting the unneeded ones, if you would like to argue, visit my talk page. Therequiembellishere 05:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
