Talk:England First Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Fascism, an attempt to better organize and unify articles relating to the fascist ideology, its impact on history and present-day organizations closely linked to both of these (ideology and history). See project page, and discussion.
This article may be listed on an index of fascist movements or people. Such listing may be controversial; feel free to contribute to discussions there. The presence of this Talk page-only template only implies that the subject is of interest to the associated WikiProject. |
Contents |
[edit] England First Party - External Links
The article contains an external link linking to a site that is completely biased against the party and contains many facts that are not backed up with any hard evidence and most alarmingly an accusation of theft against the party's chairman of $100,000 without any concrete evidence apart from a more than likely forged email which is supposed to authenticate it. The site concerned is openly hostile to the party and is hosted by company connected to a rival political party hence the hostility of the article. I could go in to lengthy detail about the inappropriateness of the inclusion of the link. I note other entries for parties sharing a similar viewpoint don’t have external links pointing to sites that are hostile to their viewpoint. I would grateful if you could advise the policy to remove this link which I feel breaches numerous conditions with relation to the accuracy, unbiased and fairness of the entry. I've tried editing but was advised I couldn’t so please advise me of the proper procedure.
84.13.75.167 19:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Religion
Public displays by religions not of European origin would be banned. So, as Christianity hails from the middle east, this party must want to ban Christianity. You have to laugh..... 89.168.28.45 22:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bias
I must say some of the slander against the party is bias. I recommend that instead of badmouthing the party, to provide evidence that what Wiki is saying is true. Thus stated in the "Religion" area of discussion, there is no authentic source.
> This has now been referenced
[edit] Compulsory vs. Voluntary repatriation
Doesn't EFP support a policy of compulsory repatriation for non-white Britons, as the BNP did until a few years ago?
