Talk:Ferdiaob/Archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Talk:Ferdiaob

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

1 Explanation
2 Ireland / Politics
3 Just a note
4 commons:User:Ferdiaob
5 iTunes 7.1.0.59
6 Personal attack
7 Edit summary
8 Test

Explanation

The reason that PureTnA was on my personal page (Wikipedia:subpages) was that it had been deleted before, when it was actually on the main wikipedia. It seems that you've restored it, but you've included the talk page as part of the main article. If you know anything about PureTnA, please add it to the article, or it risks being deleted again. Thank you! Thedreamdied 21:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Hm, sadly i know nothing about PureTnA, i only added it because it was a missing link from Empornium. Also, was just looking at some of your contributions and realised you've been signing your posts incorrectly, preventing people from replying to you; this may help:

In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Thedreamdied 17:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Ireland / Politics

What is the problem with the edits to the Ireland article, Politics section; . . .referred to by many people Northern Ireland as "The South" or "The Republic." ?

The very next sentence states that Northern Ireland can be referred to as "The North" . . .so why not include that the opposite is true? Gareth Cash 11:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

I wholly agree with Gareth and am putting them back. See the talk page for my reasons. --sony-youth^talk 18:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Just a note

If you could, please use edit summaries; when I saw your archival on my watchlist, I assumed that such a large amount of removed content without a summary was vandalism. EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

commons:User:Ferdiaob

I assert to be the same user as commons:User:Ferdiaob --Ferdia O'Brien 20:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

iTunes 7.1.0.59

Added reference giving details of large number of users experiencing problems with the latest version of iTunes —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.71.0.158 (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC).

Personal attack

Please dont use revert technology to unroll a good faith edit. You treared me as if I were a vandal which is not acceptable. Besides you are wrong as AOL UK still xists, I should know as I work for them. Eg [1], SqueakBox 23:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

What you wrote was purely POV, you had no references, and UnCut is by no means known privetly as AOLs rip-off of YouTUBE. I am more then aware of AOL UKs existance as I actually do work for them, and have done for some time now. I used the revert system to its proper intention, to revert an unneeded, unreferenced, POV edit. Ferdia O'Brien The Archiver And The Vandal Watchman 03:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

uh? That is not so. My edit was this, that sounds like someone else's edit, ie this. Your reversion of mine to which I refer is this. If you work for ASOL we are on the same side, SqueakBox 14:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. . Specifically this edit summary [2] was out of line.--Crossmr 14:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)