From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Otheruses templates
To discuss these templates as a whole, please see Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation If you wish to discuss general wordings, rather than the wording or formatting of this specific template, don't post here, or else what you say will probably go unnoticed.
For a summary page on how to use these templates, see Wikipedia:Otheruses templates (example usage).
[edit] Generic
-
- For example, {{dablink|For other senses of this term, see [[etc...]]}}. This template is adaptable, but fails to standardize hatnotes.
[edit] Otheruses
Note: All of these templates except {{Two other uses}} are special cases of {{Otheruses4}}
{{otheruses}}
(disambiguous):
For other uses, see For (disambiguation).
{{otheruses1|USE}}
(disambiguous):
This article is about USE. For other uses, see For (disambiguation).
{{This|USE|PAGE}}
:
This article is about USE. For other uses, see PAGE.
{{otheruses2|PAGE}}
(disambiguous):
For other uses, see PAGE (disambiguation).
{{otheruses3|PAGE}}
:
For other uses, see PAGE.
{{otheruses4|USE1}}
(disambiguous):
This article is about USE1. For other uses, see For (disambiguation).
{{otheruses4|USE1|USE2}}
:
This article is about USE1. For USE2, see For (disambiguation).
{{otheruses4|USE1|USE2|PAGE2}}
:
This article is about USE1. For USE2, see PAGE2.
{{otheruses5}}
:
For other uses, see For (disambiguation) and Fors (disambiguation).
(this is for when there are both a singular and plural disambiguation page; only works when the plural is formed simply by adding "s" at the end.
{{otheruses6|PAGE1|PAGE2}}
:
For other uses, see PAGE1 and PAGE2.
(for when there are two disambiguation pages, such as noun and adjective, or singular and irregular plural; there are only two parameters, they are required, and they do not auto-add "(disambiguation)")
{{Two other uses|USE1|USE2|PAGE2|USE3|PAGE3}}
(fully-specified):
This article is about USE1. For USE2, see PAGE2. For USE3, see PAGE3.
-
{{Two other uses||USE2|PAGE2||}}
(all parameters except second and third are optional; however, omitting both the first and fourth values creates ambiguity, so please avoid):
-
For USE2, see PAGE2. For other uses, see For (disambiguation).
[edit] Other people
{{otherpersons}}
(disambiguous):
For other persons named For, see For (disambiguation).
{{otherpersons|USE}}
(disambiguous):
For other persons named USE, see USE (disambiguation).
{{otherpersons|USE|PAGE}}
:
For other persons named USE, see USE (disambiguation).
{{otherpeople2|PAGE}}
:
For other persons of the same name, see PAGE.
{{otherpeople3|USE1|USE2}}
:
This article is about USE1. For USE2, see For (disambiguation).
{{otherpeople4|USE1|USE2|PAGE}}
:
This article is about USE1.
For USE2, see PAGE.
[edit] Otherhurricaneuses
- For articles on storms.
{{otherhurricaneuses}}
(disambiguous):
For other storms of the same name, see For (disambiguation).
{{otherhurricaneuses|DISAMBIG}}
:
For other storms of the same name, see DISAMBIG.
{{otherhurricaneuses|DISAMBIG|THIS}}
:
This article is about THIS. For other storms of the same name, see DISAMBIG.
{{otherhurricaneuses3|USE1|USE2|MAIN}}
:
This article is about the USE1. For the USE2, see the main article, MAIN. For other storms of the same name, see For (disambiguation).
[edit] For (other topic)
{{For}}
(disambiguous):
For {{{1}}}, see For (disambiguation).
{{For|OTHER TOPIC}}
(disambiguous):
For OTHER TOPIC, see For (disambiguation).
{{For|OTHER TOPIC|PAGE}}
:
For OTHER TOPIC, see PAGE.
{{For|OTHER TOPIC|PAGE1|PAGE2}}
:
For OTHER TOPIC, see PAGE1 and PAGE2.
{{For2|OTHER TOPIC|LINK TO [[PAGE1]] AND [[PAGE2]]}}
:
For OTHER TOPIC, see [[LINK TO PAGE1 AND PAGE2]].
[edit] Otherusesof (topic)
{{otherusesof}} (disambiguous)
:
For other uses of "For", see For (disambiguation).
{{otherusesof|TOPIC}}
:
For other uses of "TOPIC", see TOPIC (disambiguation).
{{otherusesof|TOPIC|PAGE}}
:
For other uses of "TOPIC", see PAGE.
[edit] Redirect
{{Redirect|REDIRECT}}
(disambiguous):
“REDIRECT” redirects here. For other uses, see REDIRECT (disambiguation).
{{Redirect|REDIRECT|DISAMBIG|PAGE}}
:
“REDIRECT” redirects here. For DISAMBIG, see PAGE.
{{Redirect2|REDIRECT1|REDIRECT2}}
(disambiguous):
"REDIRECT1" and "REDIRECT2" redirect here. For other uses, see REDIRECT1 (disambiguation).
{{Redirect3|REDIRECT|TEXT|ITALICS}}
:
"REDIRECT" redirects here. TEXT.
{{Redirect4|REDIRECT1|REDIRECT2}}
(disambiguous):
"REDIRECT1" and "REDIRECT2" redirect here. For other uses, see REDIRECT1 (disambiguation) and REDIRECT2 (disambiguation).
{{Redirect5|REDIRECT|USE|PAGE}}
:
"REDIRECT" redirects here. For USE, see PAGE.
{{Redirect6|REDIRECT|USE1|PAGE1|USE2|PAGE2}}
:
"REDIRECT" redirects here. For USE1, see PAGE1. For USE2, see PAGE2.
-
{{Redirect6|REDIRECT|USE1|PAGE1||}}
(See note for {{Two other uses}} above)
-
"REDIRECT" redirects here. For USE1, see PAGE1. For other uses, see REDIRECT (disambiguation).
[edit] "Not to be confused with"...
Do not use subst: with these templates, as that will prevent:
- propagating changes as the template is modified; and
- the What links here (WLH) listing.
DO NOT EDIT THESE TEMPLATES UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING
These templates may be used in thousands of articles, and changing the syntax could therefore break thousands of articles. If you wish to edit a disambiguation template first ask yourself:
- Is there already another template that will do this job? We have lots of disambiguation templates already, see Category:Disambiguation and redirection templates.
- Do I really need a template for this? Will it ever get used on any other articles, or should I just use {{dablink}} instead?
- Do I know what will happen if I change the parameters around? Will it break existing uses of the template, and if so, can I fix them all?
[edit] Notices
[edit] TfD May 2005
There is an archived discussion about this template at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/Not_deleted/May_2005#Template:For. There was no consensus for deletion. Joe D (t) 10:10, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
[edit] Which is the better aligment?
Please explain why "to the right" is where disambiguation "belongs". I've never, ever seen disambiguation text right-justified, until now. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:03, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
What is the point? We already have an otheruses template. --Yath 04:35, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- The "otheruses" template and its relatives are horribly obnoxious. I replace them with others at every opportunity. This template, on the other hand, seems unobjectionable (so far). Michael Hardy 19:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- I am not sure I understand what is obstructive, as mentioned by Stevertigo in the edit summary of this template. About the aligmnent, I wonder what other people think. Oleg Alexandrov 12:36, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
- I understand why Stevertigo wants this aligned right. You're all thinking this is a template for disambiguation notices, but when I went around removing it from pages which do not need disambiguation (i.e. their pages are already sufficiently disambiguated) I realised it wasn't for disambiguation, it was simply for linking to other pages with slightly similar names. In other words, a trivia template that gives far too much priminance to its trivia. It has been coopted for disambiguation purposes which is fine, as long as people don't go on using for trivia purposes. Joe D (t) 13:06, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Horizontal rule
On a number of articles, the template is followed by a horizontal rule, which serves to distinguish it from the (often completely unrelated) article. I like that arrangement, and have taken to using it whenever I add (or come across) a dab template. Would anyone have any objection to adding it to the template itself? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:36, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
For {{{1}}}, see [[{{{2}}}]].
- No way, we should put this template into a giant colored box! </sarcasm> -- Netoholic @ 21:59, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
-
- In all seriousness, I prefer the plain link, without the horizontal rule. Also, this could possibly be used for noting multiple links. Adding an HR would separate them more than necessary. Example: {{for|Foo|Bar}} {{For|Lah|Dee Dah}}:
For Lah, see Dee Dah.
-
- If you want to see a divider, add this code to your style sheet (probably at User:Mel Etitis/monobook.css):
- .dablink { border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa; }
- Hope this helps. -- Netoholic @ 22:16, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- I object. The indenting and italics are sufficient to set off the dab line. A horizontal rule would be unnecessary visual clutter. --Yath 22:13, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Obviously I object as well, see Talk:Simple Plan. Taco Deposit | Talk-o to Taco 22:27, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
- I think the horizontal rule looks good, but given Netoholic's argument about multiple uses in a single article, it should probably stay out of the template. Of course, a giant pastel colored box would be optimal. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 23:26, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
-
- I'm still bemused by the vehemence with which some editors view a simple horizontal line, but I can certainly see Netoholic's point, and withdraw the suggestion. I'll continue adding the line where I add a link, though, as I think (though not quite as passionately as its detractors) that it looks better, and makes articles clearer for readers. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:41, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed edit
Revert to the edition with right-aligned italic text and indent. The current formatting doesn't stand out from the rest of the text in the article and is simply ugly. It just looks like it's the beginning of the article, when in fact it's a disambiguation note. Todor→Bozhinov 11:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please bypass your cache. —Mets501 (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Does it support lables?
In other templates (e.g. template_talk:main - note that you can only learn about it in the discussion page), one can use l1=label (or in general "lX=label" for linkX). "l" is a small "L". X is a number.
This isn't detailed here and both l or lX don't work. Is this possible via another parameter? If not, it really should be possible.
[edit] Interwiki
Please, add sl:Predloga:Zapomen. Thanks a lot. --Eleassar my talk 13:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Red links in template
Is it ok to have a {{for}} tag in an article directing to an article with a red link (assuming the article won't be written any time soon)? I don't believe it is acceptable, but I just want to double check. –Crashintome4196 18:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- If it's a legitimate article, can't you just create a stub? — Eric Herboso 13:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)