User talk:Funpika/Archive/Jan-June 2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] C. S. Lewis
Hi, I noticed that you have failed the C. S. Lewis article's nomination for GA status. You give the reason that the article needs to use in-line citations, but the good article criteria state that "the use of inline citations is not mandatory". I had already established from ExplorerCDT on the talk page that the article's citation style was not an issue, so I'm a little confused. Could you please clarify? Martin 00:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RFPP - request
I have decline your request, out of courtesy the reason for declining this request is this policy Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection. Gnangarra 14:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reverts to Avatars article
Could you explain why you are reverting MisfitToys's copyedits to this page? [1] They appear correct. WjBscribe 22:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I just misunderstood why those edits were made. I need to find an article explaining "copyedits". Funpika 22:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Copyedit is really just another word for proofreading. As to the changes themselves. They'll be explained on one the manual of style pages. Probably WP:MOS-L. WjBscribe 22:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Vandalwarning
I hope you do realize that there are a great deal of people helping work on reducing vandalism on articles featured on the Main Page. If I accidentally reverted over another version because the previous one was vandalized, then I apologize, but I don't think a warning is called for. Just a thought. --Steven 00:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am removing the warning from your talk page right now. Funpika 00:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thankyou. I'll take care to revert vandalism quicker from now on so I don't override someone else again. --Steven 00:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wii
I noticed that you voted on the Wii's FAC. Being a Nintendo fan also and knowing rules of FAC, would you please mention that you are a Nintendo fan or abstain due to bias. Usually, it is good etiquette for people associated with the article to not vote, but rather improve the article. The Placebo Effect 01:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am removing the vote. Funpika 01:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't remove it, just cross it out with your reason The Placebo Effect 01:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I can't find a single edit from Funpika in the Wii article. Being an aficionado of a certain topic doesn't de facto disqualify you from supporting an article about it. Funpika, if you honestly feel that the article fulfills the proper criteria, you should support it, and neither does one have to point it out in the support unless one really feels it is necessary. Placebo, I believe you should be more careful about handing out proscriptions like this.
- Peter Isotalo 12:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Don't remove it, just cross it out with your reason The Placebo Effect 01:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Crawdaunt
Am I allowed to remove this article from the PokeProject's Current Focus Section now?(It's a GA.) Vikrant Phadkay 16:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- GA was the goal? Fine with me. Unless you want to make sure it reaches Featured it should stay. Funpika 17:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
