From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "Lie"
Decline reason: "The way you're talking, you're clearly a sock of somebody. At some point, it doesn't matter to me who of. – Luna Santin (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
- Yes, Verdict (talk • contribs) has been caught lying repeatedly. This is no grounds for an unblock of this abusive sockpuppet of a user banned by community consensus, though. --Yamla 17:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
This admin is lying. He has no proof i am Verdict and he tryies to keep many people out of Wikipedia by saying they are not welcome and blocking them. If it was not for him. It would not be so many sockpuppets on the pedia. He should not have the right to be an admin. He gives orders thinking he is the boss what he does is not right and i have seen him get many critics on his talk page.
- See [1] and WP:BAN. --Yamla 17:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
