Talk:Great Flag Debate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Great Flag Debate is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ). |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
Reid, why did you revert my edit? The images were put in better locations, and I got rid of a redundant section.Habsfannova 16:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Not vexillologically correct?
This judgment, placed in the box with an illustration of Pearson's proposal, requires explanation! Dynzmoar 19:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- If the red maple leaves were placed on a blue background this would violate the heraldic rule of tincture, which is often (usually?) followed in flag design as well. Dr pda 14:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
