Talk:Headache
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess. | |
| Unassessed | rated as Unassessed-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. This article has been tagged since January 2007. |
 |
Information from Headache appeared on Portal:Medicine in the Did you know section on August 11, 2006. |
 |
Some text in this article originally came from http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/headache/headache.htm and http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/headache/detail_headache.htm (public domain)
Contents |
[edit] How common are headaches?
The article currently claims that toothache is more common than headache. This seems like an odd thing to say. Could someone cite a respectable source for it? --LostLeviathan 03:54, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
I agree as well. Toothaches are much less frequent for the general population than headaches. There are many more factors that can cause headaches than toothaches, such as the amount of nerves for instance. Grandeandy 22:56, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
i third this. ive only had a couple of toothaches in my lifetime, but headaches happen all the time. we need a cite for that, or it gets removed. -- jeffthejiff 17:57, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Causes
My Doc told me the main cause of headaches was dehydration.. is he a big fat lying doc or is there some truth to this womans words? --Irishpunktom\talk 13:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Probably not the main cause, but certainly one of the myriad causes of headache. I know I can get headaches when dehydrated - I notice this on fast days unless I have tapered my caffeine intake on the previous days (caffeine contributes to dehydration, as seasoned air travellers will tell you). JFW | T@lk 00:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Cause?
It is my view that headaches are mostly...IDIOPATHIC. And the doctor who suggests that toothaches are more common than headaches is, in all probability, idiotic.
- An interesting statement. So people have pain in their head, sometimes very severe and disabling, and you are suggesting it is idiopathic? Which doctor suggests that toothaches are more common? I'd say the opposite. Headaches are extremely common and underreported. Most are tension-related, with important other causes being the vasculogenic headaches such as migraine, and rare emergencies such as meningitis and subarachnoid haemorrhage etc. JFW | T@lk 13:28, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
No. I am not suggesting that very severe and disabling pain in the head is idiopathic. And yes, headaches are extremely common and underreported.
- I'll suggest that JFW doesn't know what idiopathic means 220.239.3.147 11:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed external links:
I poropose that the following external links be added to this article:
The WHA is the patient/community branch of the International Headache Society, the international medical association for health care professionals who treat head pain disorders. The WHA site provides information and support for headache sufferers on an international level.
ACHE is the patient branch of the American Headache Society. The purposes of their Web site is to provide education for both patients and for health care professionals who do not avail themselves of the education available through the American Headache Society.
I do not know the membership figures for either organization, but membership is not required to access and utilize the resources of their Web sites. Membership figures for the NHF, which is already linked to, are also unknown. They, however, limit acess to parts of their site to paid members only.
Both the WHA and ACHE sites are HON Code accredited.
Thanks, --TeriRobert 18:44, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- Could you provide the Alexa rank for both? Will you also follow up my recommendation (on your talkpage) to contribute original content to the article in addition to external links? JFW | T@lk 09:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
I don't understand the importance Alexa rankings. Would you mind helping me understand it? For that matter, I'm looking at Alexa now, and I'm not sure what it is that you want. Is it the Traffic Rank? If so, the ACHE rank is 363,477; the WHA rank is 2,655,720. If that's what is being requested, I don't understand. Traffic rank has nothing to do with quality of site content and value.
As for contributing to original content, I asked you on my talk page about adding content on types of headaches not covered here, but you didn't answer me. I've contributed to both Migraine and Rebound Headache since we last communicated.
Do you, by any chance, feel more comfortable with edits when you know something about the person making the edits? If so, you can read my bio at About.com [1].
Thanks,
--TeriRobert 14:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- So it seems ACHE receives a reasonable bit of traffic compared to the WHA. Traffic rank indicates popularity - people do tend to go for higher-quality content instead a teenager's "my headache" GeoCities page.
- I had a look at your profile, and I admire the work you are doing for patients with chronic headaches. I strongly agree with the concept of patient-physician partnership and the importance of education. Having dealt mainly with acute headaches, I feel strongly that it may be harmful to medicalise certain problems. Sometime a doctor needs to be a teacher (docere is to teach) rather than ordering one test after the other. JFW | T@lk 09:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Right, of those two, ACHE definitely has more traffic. It's an older site, and people in some of the countries to whom the WHA offers support have populations who don't have the prevalence of Internet access that's become so common in areas such as the UK and North America. Would you be OK with adding both sites though since the WHA site does have international information that's unique to their site?
Thanks for looking at my work and your comments. I love to meet doctors who feel "a doctor needs to be a teacher." Those doctors really do seem to be great with treating headache disorders with good results. Certainly, I think patients who have an internal locus of feeling they need to take responsibility for their health and successful treatment do better than those with the external locus who want their doctors to simply give them a prescription that will make it all better.
Regarding the Headache article, I don't see much to be added to that page itself, but I think we could do with adding a couple of related articles such as Chronic Daily Headache, New Daily Persistent Headache, and perhaps a couple of others. What do you think?
Thanks,
--TeriRobert 03:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Clinical differentiation
It may be relevant here - JAMA this week has a lovely article in the "Rational Clinical Examination" series how to distinguish migraines by five simple history questions, as well as identifying patients who need a CT scan to exclude intracranial haemorrhage/other structural causes. Abstract. I may include this later. JFW | T@lk 09:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Intersting Abstract. Thanks. I've bookmarked it to go back and read the article. It looks like something that would interest my readers, so I may want to write on it. Just spent a couple of days in the hospital, so I'm a bit behind. Darn, but I hate getting behind. Thanks again!
--TeriRobert 03:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Diagnosis
I have added a section on basic clinical skills into the diagnosis section. CT and MRI are of little value in the diagnosis of most headache patients. Of far greater value is a careful history. This is probably just as well, as the vast majority of the world's population do not have ready access to these technologies. Jbelsey 09:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Absolutely. I completely agree. Well done too for inserting the reference to the superb JAMA article on the POUNDing scoring system. JFW | T@lk 16:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fatality
I'm not medical but surely the assertion that "although more than 95% of headaches are not life-threatening" is entirely misleading. I have had thousands of headaches in my life so the next one is likely to be fatal. (yes I know stats doesnt work like that).
But this figure of 95% could just as easly by 99% or 9% - this assertion says nothing.
Can a medic confirm my view ..... break it to me gently I might be on my 96th headache ! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Victuallers (talk • contribs) 19:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC).
