Talk:Heart disease
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I just went through a lot of what links here, and I'm not so sure this should be a disambiguation page. The subtopics are so close that one could make this an article instead of a dab page, and the subtopics would hang together. I'd propose taking away the disambiguation tag and making this a straight article on heart disease.
Moreover, most of the links which go ti suk bithch o heart disease mean it in a very general sense. For examples, see Alcoholism, Finland, Demographics of Japan. In none of these cases would it be appropriate to disambiguate the links; they really need to point here.
Anyway, I just wanted to put this up for comment to see if there were any obvious reasons to keep it the way it is that I hadn't thought of. --Deville (Talk) 15:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Absolutely, this is not a dab page. You can remove the {{disambig}} straight away as far as I'm concerned.--Commander Keane 16:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- I agree...straight article on heart disease.--MikeJ9919 23:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Support one unified page. Draeco 06:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know enough about the subject to know whether there should or shouldn't be a unified page, but what's here now is a rather sad and neglected affair that sees more vandalism than it really should. If anything meaningful can be said about heart disease in general - about all the types that are listed here combined - then it should be said here. The current page is a bit embarrassing. Bill Oaf 00:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
"If" people really wanted to stop heart disease..saying we could..why aren't they takin more steps in lowering the chances.Such as eating right..running..and choosing right from wrong! I say people should take that extra step and if it doesnt help then they can complain!(06-5-2006)
Could we put a link to the myocardium on this page, it's mentioned at the end of the second paragraph
