Talk:HQ-7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. | ||||||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Re-wrote & re-formatted the article -- Adeptitus 23:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Added a "citation required" tag for two reasons:
- This opinion does need a citation.
- The existence of a long range SAM does not invalidate the need for a shorter one, especially the HQ-9, which is supposedly cursed with a ridiculously high min alt (for a modern long range SAM) of 500m, which would render it rather useless against seaskimmers, and would explain why they are still buying Russian SAMs. Kazuaki Shimazaki 00:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Agreed -- opinion line removed. -- Adeptitus 22:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
