User talk:Janviermichelle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive1

Contents 1 Categorization 2 한오백년에서 알려드립니다. 3 Kim Won-yong 4 TEPS 5 Image tagging for Image:Yuldong.jpg 6 Bundang

[edit] Categorization

Hello. You don't seem to understand how the categorization system works. Articles should be in their narrowest categories and should not also be in any supercategories of those categories. For example, if an article is in Category:Buddhist philosophical concepts which is a subcategory of Category:Buddhism, it does not also need to be in Category:Buddhism. It's already in its proper subcategory. Please don't add supercategories to articles which have been properly categorized. Thanks. Ekajati (yakity-yak) 17:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 한오백년에서 알려드립니다.

현재 한오백년에서는 다음 부분에 대한 논의가 진행되고 있습니다.

1. KAIS (Korean Ani-comic Image Solution)의 한오백년 공식 정책 채택 투표 (3:0입니다)
2. 사용자:Airridi/유저박스를 전반적인 GUS틀 보관소로 잡는 방안에 대한 논의 (즉, en:쪽 보다는 de:쪽을 따르게 됩니다.)
3. 최근 Airridi님과 딸기님 건에 의한 서명 문제.

참여와 토론을 부탁드립니다. 참고로 정책 투표는 관례에 의거 투표종료시까지 전체의 과반수 이상 참여, 과반수 이상 찬성이 아니면 통과될 수 없습니다. - Ellif 2006년 10월 16일 (화) 17:50 (KST)

[edit] Kim Won-yong

Wow, so you just erase things like that, eh? Is the SNU article 'yours'? You must be pretty powerful to crush people's contributions so quickly. Why not read Kim Won-yong before getting on your high horse. Kim Won-yong is the Father of Archaeology in Korea and was one of the founding members of SNU. He is also a giant in 20th century Korean intellectual history. Who are you to decide relative important of things? Speak now! You page says you want to be inclusive! Mumun 19:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I get it -- you think I am one of the vandals that you revert. Please work with me here. You do not own this article. You need a section devoted to notable faculty Mumun 20:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

i still don't think he's notable. if you do think then revert the article. do whatever you want. Janviermichelle 05:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TEPS

the article is a bit promotional ... you refer to Lyle Bachman et al. I assume, Studies in Language Testing 1 (1995), but I doubt "approval" is the right word, given the professor's theoretical inclinations - please provide the reference 125.241.245.18 06:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Yuldong.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yuldong.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bundang

Hi Janviermichelle, I've copyedited some of your additions to Bundang. I know you're editing in good faith, but much of the prose was not written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia. Also, you used several peacock terms which are discouraged, facts should always be backed up by sources. Give me a shout if you ever need anything. Deiz talk 08:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I've also proposed TEPS for deletion, as I am unsure that it meets out notability criteria. Please don't take these or any other edits personally, just following procedure. Deiz talk 09:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

In the absence of sources or verification, I've sent TEPS to WP:AFD. Deiz talk 01:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

nice job. Janviermichelle 01:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

• You're never going to convince me that mentioning that taxis have call numbers is in any way encyclopedic. Of course it's true. It's not exactly something I'm going to start a revert war over, but I really think it makes the article read like a travel guide rather than an encyclopedia entry. Deiz talk 04:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
  • It reads like a travel guide in that sense. i agree with you. if you wrote your point when you edit the article, it would be much more convincing to me. Janviermichelle 20:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
    • OK. Sorry if some of my edits are a bit sharp, I do a lot of cleanup work and some of it is pretty rough-and-tumble. There is a good reason in policy / guideline / precedent for everything I do, I do sometimes need to remember that that won't be obvious to everybody... Deiz talk 23:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)