Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. Debenedictus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. Debenedictus, 480 U.S. 470 (1987) was an important United States Supreme Court case regarding the interpretation of a "taking." The court upheld a Pennsylvania law which limited coal mining that caused damages to buildings, dwellings and cemeteries through subsidence. Despite the fact that the law required 50% of the coal beneath those structures to be left in place, a 5 to 4 decision written by Justice Stevens found that the law did not constitute a regulatory taking under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Justices Rehnquist, Powell, O'Conner and Scalia dissented.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96027/96027d854bf11c1c5f4d335c98259260d2cf46e9" alt=""