User talk:Kumarrao
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] Telugu Chodas=
You have edited and deleted references that were mentioned about Telugu Chodas.Donot do this again i will have to take this to the Administrators... You can Only delete it if you can prove me wrong or you have counter claims.>>>
[edit] Notable Kammavaru
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Notable Kammavaru, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Awyong J. M. Salleh 00:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 15:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your message
I left a message at Talk:Kamma (caste) as well as an earlier message above; you've ignored both — you're still not signing your messages, nor using edit summaries. If you make edits to an article without saying what you're doing or why you're doing it, and without giving sources, your edits are very likely to be reverted. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 10:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- The trouble is that your edits included incorrect formatting, the removal of large chunks of text, and various additions, none of which was given a source. You added a couple of books to the references at the end, but it's not clear that or how they justify all or any of your changes. Could you explain at the Talk page what you want to change, and why? --Mel Etitis (Talk) 12:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kamma (caste)
I've explained the position at the Talk page. It's no good merely saying that you've made changes — you need to say why, and to back up your explanation with verifiable sources, as explained at WP:CITE. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's not clear what you mean when you say that you add references whenever relevant; when are they not relevant? You certainly never have the courtesy to give an edit summary. Moreover, you have introduced an astonishing number of errors into Kamma (caste) — with regard both to the English and the Wikipedia style.
- Frankly, as the vast majority of the editors who are obsessed with India-related articles seem to have absolutely no interest in Wikipedia (or any) standards of writing and editing, I'm giving up on them. I think that it's a real pity that this whole area of Wikipedia should be so deeply inferior, as it's important — but I can no longer spare the time and energy to defend it. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 11:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
