Talk:Ligand (biochemistry)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Cell Signaling, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to cell signaling and signal transduction. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the Cell Signaling WikiProject project, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. To participate, visit the WikiProject for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Signal transduction. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.. |
|||
Contents |
[edit] Ligand merger, NO
I see significant difference. The bio definition would have been NO help in answering my chemistry student's question. The chem definition was precisely what I needed. 68.114.63.121 20:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Chem Teacher
[edit] Merge notice
I do not quite see the difference between the definition here and the definition at ligand, so I suggest we merge these two articles. / Habj 01:50, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
agreed (141.211.222.165) (copied from Talk:Ligand by User:Walkerma
[edit] Ligand
I see a big difference, in chemistry ligand has quite a different meaning than in biochemistry, and the explanation that is given here starts to show that difference. User:Kirklucy
I strongly disagree with this proposed merge for two reasons.
- A ligand in inorganic chemistry is completely different from a biochemical ligand. For example a biochemical ligand is usually held in place by weak intermolecular attractions, whereas a chemical ligand is usually bound quite strongly.
- Aside from this, each concept is important enough in its own field to warrant having its own article. Walkerma 02:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Also in the edit history for this article, is a comment by User:Melianis, "this one needs way more work, but not merge".
Hi i'm just a science reader but i also disagree with this merge: In biology, a ligand is an extracellular substance that binds to receptors.
In chemistry, a ligand is an atom, ion or functional group that donates its electrons through a coordinate covalent bond to one or more central atoms or ions, usually metals. An array of such ligands around a center is termed a complex.
- The two concepts, in chemistry and biochemistry, should remain separate. User:Ceyockey 19:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
While the two concepts are different, it might help to mention briefly(with a link) in each article, the other concept, so that a person looking for general information has the option of using either or both.
Agreed, the concepts are related, but not the same. 71.96.132.182 22:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
I personally would like them separate. This is the information I was looking for, not the other.--Dan 02:00, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- I also disagree with the merge and I think the majority also disagrees. Therefore the merge notices should be removed V8rik 22:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ligand2
I think the biological definition should be moved to the biochemical ligand page since it is just a simplified version of the biochemical definition. What is the reason for having the biological definition on the chemistry page and the biochemical definition separate?
[edit] ligand binding affinity
I am going to add another figure to better illustrate Kd and binding affinity. --JWSchmidt 04:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Disambiguation
I have created the page ligand (disambiguation) and added the otheruses template to ligand and ligand (biochemistry). When checking what links to ligand (these links), I feel that many of them should actually point to ligand (biochemistry). Could you help me sorting these out? --Dirk Beetstra 10:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ya
Is "ya" a misspelling in "resulting in altered behavior of an ya associated ion channel or enzyme"? If so, can someone with more knowledge than I correct this? David 00:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
