User talk:Lord of Haha
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Re:thankyou
No problem. I hate spammers! Welcome to Wikipedia! Gadig 03:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Soccer spam
Sorry for stepping on your cleanups—nice work! —johndburger 05:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Smumncally.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Smumncally.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cavenba 18:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I see you tagged Public Domain and that it is under Crown Copyright. This is a contradiction. Crown Copyright is similar to Non-Commercial (if attribution is given), thus is a Copyright Violation. You may be confusing Crown Copyright with the government copyright system in the United States. Cavenba 06:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- As Wikipedia cannot have images that are "non-commercial," the only option would be for someone to make a free alternative (take a picture themselves). Cavenba 20:38, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
