User talk:LW77
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As you seem to be interested in Australia-related articles, yo umight also be interested in the Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board. It's also good to see another person writing about Hopf algebras! JPD (talk) 17:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Not kidding at all, although I've only really touched one Hopf algebra on Wikipedia. I was really surprised when I looked at your contributions! JPD (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Minister for Defence
Cheers, Jpe|ob 04:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CfD
Check this out: [1] bunix 02:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lyttleton
Thanks for the compliment -- it's not my pic though. I was looking at the recent image uploads from FlickrLickr (which imports appropriately-licensed photos from Flickr into commons), and noticed that one going by, so I added it. I may have a couple pictures I took from the summit of the Christchurch Gondola looking inwards, but I don't remember if any showed Lyttelton itself. I'll look later this week when I get back home. I did add Image:BanksPeninsulaModel.jpg to a couple of articles; maybe it would help the Lyttelton article too. Carl Lindberg 05:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Infobox
Trying to reach an infobox consensus here: [2]. Please can you weigh-in with your opinion? SureFire 00:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Hopf algebras
I guess the point Blnguyen was making was that calling the quasi-Hopf algebras "Hopf algebras" is slightly questionable. Mathematically it's wrong, but in general speech it sort of makes sense. They definitely belong in the related concepts section, though. Then you have the question of whether the WP category structure is meant to be correspond to "X is a Y", which there is some dispute about. It all really depends how broadly you interpret the category structure, but I do agree that you'd have to interpret it quite broadly indeed to include bi-algebras and co-algeabras. Perhaps they should be put directly in Cat:Abstract Algebra instead, and possibly Augmentation ideal as well. Then again, perhaps we should talk to User:Charles Matthews, who seems to be the one that put them in that category to start with. JPD (talk) 10:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, LW77. I made a comment on this on JPD's talk page - perhaps you'd like to respond too? QuantumGroupie 19:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Australian honours
Hi LW77, Australian Honours System is probably the most relevant place and I see you've already done a fair bit of work there. I have no expertise in that area by the way. Did you a specific question? If so, WP:AWNB is very well attended and someone there should be able to point you in the right direction. As far as projects go, no, I don't believe that there is one and surprisingly, I cannot see any projects across Wikpedia at all that deal with honours specifically. If you want to see if there's any interest you could post a note at Wikipedia:WikiProject/List of proposed projects I suppose. Good luck and feel free to ask if you have any questions. — Moondyne 12:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Crikey!, I see that I created Australian Honours System, way back in November 2003. I'd completely forgotten about that. — Moondyne 12:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, congratulations. A friend of mine got one also and I was going to ask him next time I saw him if I could take a photo of it for the article. Would you mind? I think a project would be interesting and I'd be hapy to be involved, its just that I've got a bit too much on the go already at the moment. How about I post a note as per the above to see if anyone else is interested? -- — Moondyne 13:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't answer your first question: No I didn't win one. — Moondyne 13:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- I posted a note at Wikipedia:WikiProject/List_of_proposed_projects#Australian_and_Commonwealth_honours. Seeing you sucked me into this, you better add your username! — Moondyne 13:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't answer your first question: No I didn't win one. — Moondyne 13:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, congratulations. A friend of mine got one also and I was going to ask him next time I saw him if I could take a photo of it for the article. Would you mind? I think a project would be interesting and I'd be hapy to be involved, its just that I've got a bit too much on the go already at the moment. How about I post a note as per the above to see if anyone else is interested? -- — Moondyne 13:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, judging the the overwhelming response, and that the issue is falls under the auspices of Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics and/or Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia, I'm going to remove the notice. That of course doesn't mean that the project is not worth setting up if you wish to do so - that notice is not asking for permission, its simply a tool to advertise for interested parties to be involved. Unfortunately, I have a lot on my plate at this time and would prefer not to be involved in another project, particularly one that will need a fair bit of work in its infancy. Cheers — Moondyne 03:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Uploading images
How do i go about uploading an image of a medal? Where do i find the tag you used for [[3]]? Crested Penguin 02:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)