Talk:Matt Entenza
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
[edit] Vandalism
There have been a number of edits recently by an anonymous user. These edits have change the article content slightly to support a position critical of Entenza. I feel that the content of the Star Tribune article linked to is accuratly summed up by the current edit. Inserting statements beyond what is in the cited story is outside the scope of this article and probably violates the NPOV policy. (User 70.57.147.253, you make a lot of edits. Why don't you create an account?) --Nscheibel 18:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Also, an anonymous user from 63.224.4.x has been removing all content relating to Entenza's withdrawal from the AG race. --Nscheibel 13:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Geeze, call the Wikipedia police. Get over it
Do you have their number? 911 didn't seem to know. --Nscheibel 15:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Nscheibel. This article sucks as it is sooo unbalanced it clearly violates NPOV! I know this guy & IT DOES NOT PROPERLY REFLECT HIM AT ALL. I would think that if you are going to profile a LAWYER you should be careful what you write...and consequently Wikipedia should either fix it or pull it. Contrary to the assertion in the article about DFLers among his detractors...WE LOVE HIM!!!71.82.119.90 23:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV
Just about this entire article is muckraking. I'm all for muckraking but there's no balance here - one law credited to him and then into the dirt. I think there needs to be some balance; right now it's almost entirely scandals. I don't know the guy but on a casual visit, trying to learn about him, I was disappointed both in not finding much of what I need to know, and in the balance of this article. Given the remainder of this talk page I guess I shouldn't be surprised. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.172.23.24 (talk) 16:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC).
