User talk:Mathchem271828
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Please help - inclusionism is "absurb" now
Sorry to bother you, but as an things are getting desperate and I need to appeal to your for help. We are facing a situation where a deletionist admin is free to declare inclusionist arguments "absurd" and ignore them at will. If you don't agree with this situation, please share your opinion here. Kappa 02:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Henry F. Schaefer, III
I want to make it clear to any one who might browse my talk page that I had nothing to do with the current status of that page. I tried to put it back to where it was about the science and failed because other users wanted to make it about religion and ID, which obviously aren't science.
Your eforts on the Schaefer page missed me as I was busy doing other things and anyway I am on the other side of the world and do things at different times. I was in the Schaefer group in 1990 on sabbatical and collaborated with him for several years after that. I think I have published 9 papers with him. I respect his science greatly and do not agree with him in any respect on religion. Please e-mail me from my user page and let us talk about him off wiki for a while. It is too late at night here now for more. --Bduke 11:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Sure that'd be great. --mathchem271828
- What's keeping you? I have not received an e-mail from you. --Bduke 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what your email address is. Mathchem271828 23:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Go to my user page and click on "E-mail this user" to the left. I have e-mail enabled. You do not, otherwise I would e-mail you. You can enable e-mail in "my preferences" link at the top of your page. --Bduke 01:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what your email address is. Mathchem271828 23:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Global warming
Your statement about "slowing radiational cooling" just doesn't fit the physics. Most of all it implies that Earth still cools, just at a "slower" rate. In contrast Earth isn't cooling, but is in a (quasi) equilibrium between absorbed and emitted radiation. I'd be glad to discuss the physics with you further, but the bit about "slowing radiational cooling" needs to go. Raymond Arritt 03:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- What you said doesn't make a bit of sense. If you want to revert this then discuss it on the talk page more. Mathchem271828 03:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- OK, let's move it to the Global Warming talk page where others can join in. Raymond Arritt 03:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Breit-Pauli
You wrote: Your page on the Breit-Pauli operator is really great. It should go into some list of ideal wikipedia pages.
- Thanks, I wrote it while learning for my physics exam :) Karol 10:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bra-Ket
You wrote: Hello again Karol Langner or maybe Dr. Langner. I noticed that the Bra-ket page has some errors. Some of the errors sound good enough to be plausible but I think are erroneous. I think that page needs a re-write. Maybe if you have a minute you'll take a look too?
- That would take more than a minute, which I can't spare now... and not yet Dr, but hopefully soon ;) Karol 22:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Karol thanks for getting back to me on that. I believe that the article has errors, but also has some bright spots; I think I personally object to the way some of the things are stated because I'm coming from a different perspective than the major editors who seem to be working on problems related to quantum computing. Mathchem271828 16:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)