From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/400e2/400e2363b0b2cd342825fa9bdda3cbabff15cce2" alt="Cleanup Taskforce article" |
This article is being improved by the Cleanup Taskforce to conform with a higher standard of article quality. It is likely to change frequently until completed. Please see its Cleanup Taskforce page for more details. |
The article about the METEOSAT series of satellites has been tagged for clean-up for more than a year. Mainly, the article just looks ugly rather than having any significant problems. It might benefit from a slight expansion, in particular what (if any) differences there are between the various satellites. Stewart Adcock 12:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Added to User:Katefan0/Desk Stewart Adcock 12:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Cleaned a bit, merged from EUMETSAT, desperately needs updating. ··gracefool |☺ 01:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- User left the project in May 2006. Task needs to be reassigned. --Woohookitty(meow) 08:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Added to User:Randy Johnston/Desk RJFJR 16:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
|
Does it make sense to redirect MSG-2 and Meteosat Second Generation 2 here? The idea may ease searching for those names, but will discourage contribution for the idividual satelites themselves as program detail will semm sufficient.
[edit] Title case
METEOSAT isn't an acronym or abbreviation- it's a name- how do we change it to Meteosat?
[edit] Meteosat-7 is only moved
Meteosat-7 does not end transmitions, it will only be moved to other longitude to replace Meteosat-5, according to http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/data/meteosat/ --Tomash 18:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)