Talk:Nevada Test Site

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related task forces (general topics):
	Military technology and engineering task force
	Weaponry task force
Related task forces (nations and regions):
	United States military history task force

Isn't Yucca Mountain located on the Nevada Test Site? --mav

For future Wikipedians, there is a great DOE reference listing nuclear tests at [1]

[edit] Weapon versus device

This article pretty uniformly refers to the testing of weapons, when really both weapons and devices were tested at NTS. A weapon would refer to a nuclear device that was actually designed and implemented for use in warfare, such as a warhead for a missile or a bomb that could be loaded into an airplane. A device could be a prototype or something that created an explosion for scientific or testing purposes.

A lot of weapons were tested at NTS, as they were being developed and the military needed to practice their deployment and use. But a lot of tests at NTS were scientific, and the devices they used were not of the sort that could be quickly loaded into the bomb bay of a B-52 and hauled into combat duty.

I realize the semantics of the "all nuclear explosions are bad and therefore are weapons", but it's also important to note that NTS wasn't just a parking lot where the army lit off existing nuclear weapons just to see what would happen. --Jkonrath 18:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure anyone is using the term to be pejorative. On NTS's website[2], the phrase "nuclear weapons testing" is used consistently to describe their overall mission and testing programs; "nuclear device" is used to refer to individual test charges, though almost always only in regards to Plowshares tests. While it is true that a large amount of testing was not of deliverable weapons, I do not think the distinction between a nuclear weapon and a nuclear device is very clear, and I don't think it is worth fretting over much. --Fastfission 16:48, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Those comments seem illogical; did this page ever claim that "all nuclear explosions are bad and therefore are weapons"? That might be a worthy claim {likely is}; but, the pov seems to be worthy of commentary.

[[ hopiakuta | [[ [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] -]] 21:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I, hereby, advocate that

thiis would link to:

Montebello_Islands;

Monte Bello;

Operation_Hurricane;

Maralinga,_South_Australia;

British_nuclear_tests_at_Maralinga.

These webpages claim to have been updated, revised, in 2001:

< http://anawa.org.au/sa/honeymoon.html >;

< http://anawa.org.au/news/honeymoon-approve.html >.

These pages refer to a "liquid nuclear waste dump" @ "Honeymoon uranium mine"; which is also mentioned regarding Jeannie_Lewis, Australian musician.

On < http://anawa.org.au >, there is a quote that "We can either remain in the frying pan of coal, jump into the fire of nuclear, or extinguish the flames with renewables".

That quote seems pov; however, I think that it is sufficiently demonstrably true that it should be in the articles.

Thank You.

[[ hopiakuta | [[ [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] -]] 21:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding that very top comment, I see that there is a caption of "The Yucca Flat area of the Nevada Test Site is scarred with subsidence craters from underground nuclear testing."

[[ hopiakuta | [[ [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] -]] 22:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../n/e/v/Talk%7ENevada_Test_Site_3e1e.html"

Categories: B-Class military history articles needing review | B-Class military technology and engineering articles | Military technology and engineering task force articles | B-Class weaponry articles | Weaponry task force articles | B-Class United States military history articles | United States military history task force articles | B-Class military history articles