Talk:Nikon F6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm lost. Assuming that Wikipedia is not primarily a marketing arm of Nikon, why does this camera -- excellent though it may be and expensive though it undoubtedly is -- merit its own article? Suggestion: put this (and many of the articles promised from the links proliferating in the article on Nikon) in a single artlcle on the Nikon F series/system. Hoary 08:16, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Lost of cameras do, not just this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aj uk (talk • contribs).
-
- There's certainly plenty to say about most camera models, if you research enough. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 20:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that this article is marginal and given that the camera is still in current production, it is a little too much like marketing. The F, F2, and F3 articles are pretty good, the F4 and F5 aren't so bad but this one is just fluff. "The pinnacle" of the line? That's extremely opinionated and I think a lot of Nikon buffs (or camera buffs in general) might say the F2 was the best 35mm SLR ever made.
