Talk:Octopussy and The Living Daylights
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the General Project Discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Short story task force, which deals with short story articles | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
|
Tasks you can do:
|
|||
[edit] Property of a Lady
I removed the comments that Property of a Lady wasn't adapted for the film. This is nonsense. In the short story, Bond attends an auction for Fabrege eggs. How could that not have been adapted for the film? They even reference the title of the story on screen. It was as much an adaptation as the original "For Your Eyes Only" and "Risico" -- along with elements of "Live and Let Die" were adapted for the "For Your Eyes Only" movie. To say Octopussy didn't adapt the "Property" story contradicts all the reference books on the Bond films, including James Bond: The Legacy and The Bond Files. 23skidoo 06:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
