Talk:PAETEC Communications
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
from VfD:
Non-notable, six year old telecom company. Yawn. Claims to serve entire nation, but of all the cities listed, only one sorry, two is west of the Mississippi. If I had a nickel for every company that says they are a US telecom company... Niteowlneils 22:47, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete, vanity (more or less). Whoops... Keep, I make mistakes now and then, this was one. Article needs expansion. Wyss 00:03, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)- 58,000 google hits, US$289 million in revenue for 2003. I say keep--seems to fall above previous criteria for keeping companies. Meelar (talk) 00:28, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Competitors AT&T, Sprint, MCI, and Verizon each had about 10-30 times the revenue--$20-70 billion. Niteowlneils 17:32, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- keep Yuckfoo 00:53, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on the topic would be fine. This, however, is a factoid, not an article. If not expanded to be a reasonable article by the end of VfD, delete. Geogre 04:52, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep Big enough to merit an article. This one is kind of pointless, but there's nothing wrong with keeping it around until someone expands it. Tuf-Kat 19:04, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - Notability has already been demonstrated above, the fact that it's only a stub doesn't mean it should be erased. Frankly I think even listing it here was very bizarre. ("Yawn"? A $289 million business isn't notable? Huh??) DreamGuy 09:17, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - What DreamGuy said immediately above. -- Dominus 04:37, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and allow for organic growth and expansion. GRider\talk 18:17, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
