Template talk:PD-USGov-NASA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:PD-USGov-NASA has been protected indefinitely. Use {{editprotected}} on this page to request an edit.

[edit] Usage

This template is for NASA images which were created by NASA. Not all images used by NASA were created by them; check for a copyright notice. For articles which incoporate NASA text, use {{NASA}}. --Fastfission 00:28, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 Usage 2 Looking for the right copyright tag? 2.1 USA federal government images 2.2 USA military public domain images 3 Template wording 4 NASA logo 5 other language link 6 Suggested image for the template 7 Rewording 8 Interwiki link to vi and he 9 Interwiki link to ar 10 What about joint images 11 Template rewording 12 Add "small" important notice 13 One </noinclude> to much 14 Stray double-single quotes 15 Hubble note

[edit] Template wording

I believe the wording of this template may cause confusion on occasions, by implying that all images from NASA web pages are public domain. This is not so, it's only images created by NASA that are public domain. Copyright for images such as those appearing on Astronomy Picture of the Day is retained by the creator. Can I suggest that the wording be changed as follows? Worldtraveller 17:49, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This image page contains items created by NASA, and taken from a NASA website or publication. All such works are in the public domain, with the exception of the usage-restricted NASA logo, because works created by the U.S. federal government cannot be copyrighted. See the NASA copyright policy for more information.

In the absence of any objections, I've made the change to the template. Worldtraveller 18:32, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] NASA logo

The template mentions the 'usage-restricted NASA logo' and then shamelessly uses it. From the web page linked to in the template:

This general permission does not include the NASA insignia logo (the blue "meatball" insignia), the NASA logotype (the red "worm" logo), and the NASA seal. These images may not be used by persons who are not NASA employees or on products (including web pages) that are not NASA sponsored.

Therefore, I've removed it. For the sake of appearance maybe it would be nice to add an alternative graphic, like a thumbnail of a shuttle launch or something? Worldtraveller 18:37, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It would be really nice to have it here. Look at the page for the meatball. Raul654 says he has contacted NASA for permission, talking about fair use I believe. I have asked him at his talk if he ever got an answer and if the permission would apply here as well. Jonas Olson 22:38, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I agree it would be nice to have it here but I do not think that makes it right. In fact I came to the same conclusion after I researched this myself. According to NASA's own statements they do not wish us to use their logo. We get to use everything else of theirs so this is not an unreasonable request. Triddle 04:57, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] other language link

This template has a designation as existing in another language but I don't think its working as well as attended. Because this template asserts that is available in Korean (I think), all the images that include the template do too. Check out

• Image:Controlled impact demonstration.triddle.jpg
• Image:Ap8-KSC-68PC-147.jpg
• Image:Apollo11.png

I'm mentioning this because I felt it would be wise to reach consensus before editing the template. Triddle 02:14, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Suggested image for the template

I created this simple picture from another NASA image because its a little simplier than the full launch picture used now. Here is an example:

This image page contains items created by NASA, and taken from a NASA website or publication. All such works are in the public domain, with the exception of the usage-restricted NASA logo, because works created by the U.S. federal government cannot be copyrighted. See the NASA copyright policy for more information.

What do you think?

I like that - the previous launch graphic was probably a bit too distracting for a template like this, but this is nice and simple and stylised. Looks better a little bit smaller on my screen, how does 40px wide look for anyone else? Worldtraveller 11:15, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Looks great here. Triddle 17:52, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Because there has been no objection I'm going to update the template. Triddle 00:50, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rewording

I took out the bit about the fed gov part -- there are ways in which things which look like "works of the federal government" end up being "works of contractors of the federal government" which can be a much stickier copyright situation. I also took out the public domain part and replaced it instead with a notice that NASA generates no copyrights, which I think is more to the point of it. --Fastfission 00:26, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Interwiki link to vi and he

Please add an interwiki link to the Vietnamese version of this template:

<noinclude>[[vi:Tiêu bản:PD-USGov-NASA]]</noinclude>

Thanks.

– Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 03:25, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

And one to the Hebrew Version:

[[he:תבנית:תמונתNASA]]

Done Will (message me!) 10:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Interwiki link to ar

Please add an interwiki link to the Arabic version of this template:

<noinclude>[[ar:قالب:PD-USGov-NASA]]</noinclude>

Thanks.

Done. - Bobet 11:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What about joint images

I've come across images credited to multiple agencies. What happens if an image is created by both NASA and a non-US-government agency (e.g. a university, ESA, ...)? Is this template still appropriate under those circumstances? Chaos syndrome 19:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

As soon as ESA is involved the template can't be used because of more usage restrictions by ESA. --Denniss 19:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

In case of the Hubble (NASA and ESA), {{Template:PD-Hubble}} can be used. --Van helsing 17:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

No it can't be used. As soon as ESA is involved all material is noncommercial --Denniss 17:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Based on this copyright information and the fact that the guy who made the template apparently works for ESA, I got the impression it’s okay for Hubble pictures. --Van helsing 21:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Van helsing is right. The template is not appropriate when more than one organisation is collaborating on a mission. A new tag should then be created that properly reflects this situation. Lars Lindberg Christensen 13:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Maybe he does not know about the noncommercial part of the license, many think a license for educational use is enough to be usable for Wikipedia. --Denniss 21:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Does that mean all Hubble pictures (or anything where ESA should be attributed) should be deleted? That would have quite an impact (hope I’m missing something). --Van helsing 22:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

I do know what I am talking about (I have worked with Hubble, NASA and ESA copyrights for more than 7 years). And the only thing we need to do is to re-tag the Hubble images with the new PD-Hubble tag and we are doing that at the moment. BTW: something similer ought to be done for SOHO images (also a NASA/ESA collaboration). See for instance [2], although I leave that to the SOHO experts. Below I have commented that the STScI part of the NASA tag should be deleted. STScI does explicitly not want this note in there (Cheryl Gundy (2006), private communication).

Lars Lindberg Christensen 13:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template rewording

You may want to look at the Commons version for this template, it contains soem Information about what image sources may inflict copyright problems if used with the standard NASA template. See Commons:Template:PD-USGov-NASA --Denniss 19:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Add "small" important notice

Could anybody add the warnings based on the Commons template version? Thanks. Bigtop 23:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Done. I've remirrored from commons:Template:PD-USGov-NASA. -- Netsnipe ► 11:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Someone need to rework that remirroring because several license categories needed in en wiki are now lost. --Denniss 21:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

I've restored the old enwiki categories. -- Netsnipe ► 13:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Could you convert the links on these links? Here are the links: Public domain, NASA, NASA logo, Hubble Space Telescope, Space Telescope Science Institute, Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, and Astronomy Picture of the Day. Please convert as regular links and remove the w:en: name per link as soon as possible. Thanks. Bigtop 22:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Done -- Netsnipe ► 12:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

What's the problem with the w: in the links? They seem to work and display fine. Plus I can imagine that the w: thing comes from the copying from commons. It would be good to make as few deviations from the original on commons as possible (may help to merge in future changes from commons). --Ligulem 22:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] One </noinclude> to much

To the admins: please remove the last </noinclude> from the template source code. It is not used by the template itself and breaks the layout of pages which use this template. --Bricktop 22:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I fixed the noincludes [3]. --Ligulem 22:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stray double-single quotes

* <small>All materials created by the [[Solar and Heliospheric Observatory|SOHO probe]] are copyrighted and require permission for commercial non-educational use.'' [http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/summary/copyright.html ] </small>

should be

* <small>All materials created by the [[Solar and Heliospheric Observatory|SOHO probe]] are copyrighted and require permission for commercial non-educational use. [http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/summary/copyright.html]</small>

The stray '' results in the external link being italicized (something like "[2]").

—dto (talkcontribs) 21:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hubble note

Firstly, I have checked with STScI that this note is a misunderstanding: "Materials from the Hubble Space Telescope may be copyrighted if they do not explicitly come from the STScI. [1]" so I would suggest that it be removed. Secondly we have created a PD-Hubble tag that complies with the NASA-ESA agreements on Hubble (Hubble is not a NASA project - it is an intergovernmental collaboration between NASA and ESA). This further makes the note superfluous. Lars Lindberg Christensen 13:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)