Talk:Perception management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Use by PR and advertising firms
See, for example:
The Cherenson Group William Joseph and Associates
I think this page needs to be wikified, and told from a neutral point of view. Reads out too much like a magazine article from some giant company. Thanks if you can clean up this page.
- Colin Omara.
- If you're referring to the recently-added very, very long quotations, I think they exceed the boundaries of fair use. They bear on the topic, but the editor who inserted them needs to replace them with appropriate short summaries. Dpbsmith (talk) 15:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Weasel words
There are a couple of statements in here that are a little weasel-like:
- "This would appear"
- "critics of the DOD charge"
"This would appear" is a pretty slippery statement. It doesn't make any kind of a stand. It would be better to name people or sources that believe the statement indicates that this is propaganda. To balance out the "is it or isn't it" argument, people or sources who argue against it being propaganda should also be included.
I know there are many critics of this policy who are very outspoken so it shouldn't be too hard to find a firm example of a critic (or organization) that can be named instead of a generic "critic" label, especially in regards to the coffin situation.
Epolk 18:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
