Talk:Politics of Poland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Politics of Poland is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Poland on Wikipedia. To participate simply edit the article or see our current projects and discussions. On the main project page we have some tools to help you out. Don't hesitate to ask questions! |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. |
Re: political parties
5% seems to be a much more natural choice, since (as you know) it is the minimal support needed to enter parliament. In fact the 3% threshold seems somewhat artificial and specially chosen for unia wolnosci, which currently enjoys the support of 3% + \epsilon of the population. I do think it is accurate to consider this party political plancton, as it doesn't even get mentioned by the mass media when voter preferences are disscused.
- P.S. ditto for SKL N.N. 04:49 8 mar. 2004 (UTC)
- No problem. The point is that just last Monday I saw Frasyniuk on TV in Forum program. But you for sure made me reconsider my point. Will fix it right now. BTW. Why don't you create an account?. It gives you more privacy. Przepla 16:16, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
It seems that we have clueless vandal here. User:Annygirl or User:Anna2004 apparently does not like the suffrage section and is inserting gibberish. One wonders when this user get bored with that. In the meantime, please be vigilant about this page.Przepla 15:27, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Major edit
I've updated and reorganised the article so that it's a better read. I think that the current ordering of information is the most useful to a new reader, who is likely to be most interested in 1) what's been happening recently, and 2) what is the general political structure. The rewrite of what went on during 2000-2005 is largely from my own memory (while trying to keep what was written already). I suppose that what can still be remembered several years on should correlate with what was important... Deuar 22:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] National Security
"National Security" doesn't seem to fit in with this article... If we have that, we might as well add "social security", "foreign affairs", "internal affairs", "economics", etc. etc. It should rather be in an article devoted to foreign affairs rather than politics, IMHO. Deuar 22:48, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
