Talk:Postperfusion syndrome
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Mayo Study
need a cite for the Mayo study. When I try to find it, i get to about.com which is a closed site and a dead end. Take Care Will314159 01:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reliable Sources
There is a serious problem using National Enquirer as a source to imply this syndrome is affecting Dick Cheney; especially when it never mentions Dick Cheney even once. The article is even titled CLINTON'S SECRET HEALTH CRISIS . I've removed the source and tagged it as needing citation. Let's remember WP:Reliable Sources as well as the policy of no original research AuburnPilotTalk 00:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Super Article. Needs to be footnoted I"ll come back and do it as soon as I remember how. Pumphead. Stutz, Bruce. Sci Am. July 2003. Vol.289. No.1. p.68-73. I have a subscription. I"ve downloaded it and reading it now. Espabila, Favila, que viene el Oso! Will 01:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Footnote didn't work. Here was the effort. <ref name=Scientific American>{{ |first = Bruce |last = Stutz |url = http://www.sciamdigital.com |title = Pumphead, Vol.289. No.1. p.68-73 |publisher = Scientific American |date = July, 2003 |accessdate = 2006-11-06 }}</ref> Espabila, Favila, que viene el Oso! Will 02:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- I created a reference section and converted the citations to references. If the links/sources in the External links section are actually references, they should be cited properly and removed from the External links section. -- AuburnPilottalk 17:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks APilot for getting the refs to fly right. Espabila, Favila, que viene el Oso! Will 17:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Plagerism (from the National Enquirer)
The line:
Side effects include memory loss, stilted speech, confusion, depression, and reduced hand-eye coordination. Some patients also suffer diminished sex drive.
Is a direct copy paste from the national enquirer article[1] cited later in the article without being properly referenced or quoted.
Dlodge 18:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Too Academic?
I have done a literature search on this subject and written sections with a lot of academic references - does anyone get the feeling this page has become too academic? Dlodge 18:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- IMHO, references are good-- and I think others agree. If you look at the (medical) FAs and GAs they usually have loads of references. That said, I'm not sure if the language is accessible--e.g. I'm not sure if the average lay person knows what a neurocognitive impairment is. If you haven't already read it-- WP:MEDMOS has a few things to guide medical article writing. I think a good guide to "is it too jargon filled?" is --how would you explain it to a patient? Nephron T|C 22:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
