Talk:Pregnancy category
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The actual definitions of the pregnancy categories are copied verbatim from the FDA regulations (which are in the public domain).
Reference to some of the history:
- Sannerstedt R, Lundborg P, Danielsson BR, Kihlstrom I, Alvan G, Prame B, Ridley E. "Drugs during pregnancy: an issue of risk classification and information to prescribers." Drug Saf. 1996 Feb;14(2):69-77.
- Food and Drug Administration. Federal Register 1980;44:37434-67
I'm planning on creating the following table (and a similar one for the Austrialian system) in the next day or so. Any comments? While I'm at it, I'll probably add a list of common drugs, and which pregnancy category they go in in the various classification systems. Any help in the non-FDA systems would be appreciated. Ksheka 18:19, May 12, 2004 (UTC)
- Nevermind. I'll put it in now, and discussion can be based on how it looks. :-) Ksheka 21:57, May 12, 2004 (UTC)
The passage reading "A shortcoming of the FDA definitions of the pregnancy categories is that the FDA requires an unrealistic amount of high-quality data on a pharmaceutical for it to be defined as Pregnancy Category A" doesn't seem to be fully neutral in tone. Perhaps you could consider some alternate language? Plaid 03:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- re-worded this. The american system is not simply negative. All this is is a characteristic not a shortcoming. Just look at Thalidomide. --Ccosta 02:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] inconsistency
The spellings "fetus" and "foetus" are both used in this article. Only one spelling should be used for consistency within the article.