Talk:Raoul Xemblinosky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See also: Talk:Meow Wars
The following is from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. -- Oliver P. 02:14, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Begin moved text
- Raoul Xemblinosky, the author appears to be the subject since the external link has the authors wiki user name in it. Non-famous (google shows him to be a usenet troll of some repute so I withdraw the non-famous accusation). Ark30inf 03:18, 19 Sep 2003 (UTC)
- Del. --Menchi 00:42, 20 Sep 2003 (UTC)
- Guilty as charged. Serves me right for not hiding my identity. --Shpxurnq 21:19, 21 Sep 2003
- Are there any other notable trolls? Perhaps this page could be redirected to a page about all of them. Or maybe that's a bad idea - feeding them and all that. Angela 20:35, 24 Sep 2003 (UTC)
- Please keep. Love him or hate him, he changed the face of Usenet as we know it. Thanks. David
- He already has a home in the Wikipedia. We've got to keep him. Wiwaxia 03:20, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)
- Not convinced he's important enough for an article on his own, but I think he could be merged with the rest of the Meowers. Martin 16:34, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)
- Keep redirect. Angela 00:43, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
- I dispute the claim that anyone is not important, Martin. :) I think the only meaningful criterion for inclusion of a person (or any other subject) is the amount of verifiable information we can obtain on them. So the question is: how much verifiable information is there on this person? If it is likely that there will one day be enough for an article of reasonable length, a stub would be more likely to attract this new information than a paragraph inside a more general article. -- Oliver P. 01:49, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
End moved text
I doubt there will ever be enough appropriate info for a stand-alone article - if there is in the future then it's easy enough to spin off a sub-article, I think. Let's keep the redirect for now. Martin 02:19, 28 Sep 2003 (UTC)
