Talk:Recopa Sudamericana
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There seams to be a difference between the naming used by Conmebol and the RSSSF.
For instance, Conmebol considers that Cienciano won the Recopa 2004[1] while RSSSF considers it won the 2003[2] edition.
Should we follow the Conmebol system? After all, its the official organizator, and uses the year in which the match is played. -Mariano(t/c) 17:33, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
- Better to use the Conmebol system them, as they are the competition organizators. Feel free to change the years to the Conmebol system. But would be good to mention in the article that RSSSF uses a different system. Regards, Carioca 17:44, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
-
- Well, the Conmebol is the tourney organizer, if they call it 2005, we should follow suit, whether we like it or not. This is an encyclopedia, after all, and should reflect the names as they are given by the organizers. Mariano's example about the Copa Libertadores is more than accurate. Having said all of this, I like the RSSSF way better... but such is life. :) --Sebastian Kessel Talk 19:18, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
By the way, the 1998 was played in 1999, but is still called 1998[3]. Mariano(t/c) 08:17, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
I wish they got their act together. :) --Sebastian Kessel Talk 15:24, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Date format
Why are dates in mont-day format??? I'd like to change them to day-month if that's ok... Mariano(t/c) 08:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I guess someone from the US wrote it that way, it's just how dates are given there, unlike in most of the world. In any case, I think it's better to write the month in full, that way there is no confusion for anyone.--Gabbec 14:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
