Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Davkal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Davkal
- Davkal (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Baaderthanmeinhof (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: E
Davkal is currently blocked 24 hours for 3RR. During this block the account Baaderthanmeinhof did a revert several versions back to Davkal's last version. This is the only edit by that account, and the account was created hours after Davkal was issued a one week block (during which time he may to have done IP sockpupptry as appears in the report below - looks like he created a sock account then but decided to IP edit instead, and now has used that account for sock puppetry).
Reverts that got Davkal blocked:
- 1st revert: 09:16, 13 March 2007 revert to 03:44, 13 March 2007
- 2nd revert: 07:54, 14 March 2007 revert to 19:16, 13 March 2007
- 3rd revert: 08:00, 14 March 2007 same revert as 2nd
- 4th revert: 08:02, 14 March 2007 same as above
- 5th revert: 08:35, 14 March 2007 partial revert to same version as above
Revert by Baaderthanmeinhof: 20:48, 14 March 2007
Minderbinder 19:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Davkal
- Davkal (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- 170.3.8.253 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
On September 10, during a bitter dispute between User:Davkal and the other editors at CSICOP, Davkal lost his cool (over a different article)[1] so completely that I blocked him for one week.[2] He reacted to the block with further disgustingness.[3] Today an anon with plenty of previous vandalism warnings, 170.3.8.253, vandalized CSICOP in a rather elaborate manner[4] consistent with Davkal's POV and his recent disgustingness. Mike Christie, who has been mediating the conflict, has told me[5] that he thinks the circumstances suggestive enough to warrant a checkuser, with a view to a possible longer block for Davkal. (Incidentally I'd also appreciate advice on whether the IP can be blocked for longer than the present 24 hours.) Bishonen | talk 16:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC).
Clerk note: The IP is registered to the New York State Dept of Transportation. It is likely it is someone's desktop PC. (Although it could be a division pool.) I suspect blocking will affect very few users. Thatcher131 (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I think we're done here. Mackensen (talk) 16:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
I have never IP edited at anytime on Wiki. The user Baaderthanmeinhoff is a friend who lives in the same house as me and has no real interest in Wiki other than my moaning about it. He did create an account at the time of my week long block but never used it. He made the change to the EVP article recently to see how long it would take someone to change it back. He should be home in a few hours if you would like him to explain his own reasons further but I don't think he is very interested in Wiki.Davkal 15:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Please also note that despite Milo's claim above that the IP changes to CSICOP were my doing, the IP was registered to NY state Dept of Transportation and I am in London and this was prettyu much resolved at the time the check was made. It would be quite a length to go to evade a block when I can simply walk down Stroud Green Road N4 and into any number of internet cafes and do pretty much as I please. That I have never done so despite blocks etc. shows, I think, that I am simply not in the business of trying to evade blocks by sock or meat puppetry. The user Kaldav is also mine and it has never been used in this way either.Davkal 15:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
