Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Ward Churchill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Title
This is the format of a user-conduct RfC, but Ward Churchill isn't a user. If it's an article RfC, it needs to go in that section. If it's an RfC on individual users, they should be named e.g. WP:RFC/User:X. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Slim, that's the whole point. It is in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Politics, but following the user RFC format since article rfcs are rarely effective since they're usually just ultimately nothing other than a little notice saying "ut-oh, something's wrong".
- This was mentioned earlier at Talk:Ward Churchill#RFC. karmafist 03:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Okay, well, I'm wondering whether, if people wouldn't go to the article talk page to comment, they'll come here, given that it's just an extension of the talk page. However, experimental stuff is always good to see happening. ;-) I'd like to suggest that you move the page to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ward Churchill (article), because as things stand, it's formatted to mean that Ward Churchill is a user account, and that could cause some confusion later on. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:52, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
