Talk:Richard Huggett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Neutral point of view
This article as it stands seems to be unduly biased against Mark Oaten, which is not encyclopeadic in content.
Agreed. The discussion of the events of the elections in 1997 and the later career of Mark Oaten belong elsewhere. Spuddy345
No further objections, have removed POV check. Still needs tweeking for style though. IMO Spuddy345
Surely some correction is needed for his reasons for standing? I remember Huggett on a politics radio show about by-elections a couple of years ago - he said that he kept standing because he couldn't stand the Liberal Democrats (I seem to remember him saying he found them 'sanctimonious'), and he wanted them to lose - certainly this is a far more satisfactory explanation for why he kept standing under variations of 'Liberal Democrat' than the one given, which could apply to any political party. I haven't added this, because though I remember the interview, I don't have a reference.
>>>>>>>I agree. Pity, we could do with that reference. Though for a minor and marginal political character, this entry it probably long enough. Still, i need to have a crack at that long sentance. Spuddy345
I'm not sure this really counts as a stub. for such a marginal figure, this article is pretty comprehensive. Could still do with a source for his motives though. Spuddy345
Categories: Politics and government work group articles | Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles | Unknown-priority biography (politics and government) articles | Stub-Class biography articles | Automatically assessed biography articles | Automatically assessed biography (politics and government) articles