From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd3ae/dd3ae022071a29b4eb4b8424407b1334e1e0a0c1" alt="" |
This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
"Unlike most of the Toho monster movies, which featured "action" scenes consisting of roaring monsters lumbering across the landscape at a stupefyingly slow pace"
Is it just me, or does this passage seem awfully condescending? Doesn't exactly sound very "neutral" to me.
- I agree, Controller. In fact the whole paragraph reads like completely personal opinion, and not really backed-up by the facts. It's been a while since I've seen Rodan, but I remember it as being a decent, entertaining film. But it didn't stand way out as far and away the greatest of the Toho monster movies, bar none, as seems to be implied here. Rizzleboffin 15:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)