Talk:Saliromania
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am for the merging of wet and messy fetishism and this article. Anyone else?Lotusduck 08:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I disagree, WAM is mostly about the erotic pleasure of experiencing mess, not humiliating or destroying a persons apppearence, it tends to be "fun" rather than sadistic Urso 14:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Can you find a published source that supports your claim? Certainly nothing in either article suggests that difference. Lotusduck 17:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
the gates refernce in wam is a pretty complete description of the fetish. -but in what way is the saliromania article more valid than the wam one- I've never heard of it and I doubt many have, its not any better referenced -a pdf which doesn't work and an article from 1931- wam comes from exposure to modern mass media, which didn't exist in 1931, the fetish which existed then would have been completely different; it seems to have no online community, unlike wam, -it should be saliromania going into wam not the other way round. Saliromania is an old fetish which no longer exists in the form originally described, WAM is a phenomenon of the modern age, and the more relevant of the two Urso 17:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- So merge Saliromania to WAM if that's the way you feel about it.Lotusduck 18:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- so what's the protocol, propose the merger and wait for comments, or just go ahead and do it? Urso 19:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, I'm not sure if anyone is actively editing this article. If it doesn't look like it I'm sure you can do whatever you like. Lotusduck 20:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- you know, if it was up to me, I'd leave both articles as they are. Lets leave it a while and see if anyone else has an opinion Urso 21:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
see Talk:Wet and messy fetishism for continuation of merger discussion Urso 15:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Move to salirophila
It seems like salirophila would be a more appropriate title for this article. the -mania suffix seems to refer less to the typical form of the fetish and more to an unhealthy obsession. I propose we give the matter one weeks to be discussed and come to a decision about the move. Fsecret 20:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support -- As per my argument above. Fsecret 20:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unsure I would prefer some attribution to articles using the term with -philia before the article would be moved as such.Lotusduck 20:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unsure according to google, salirophilia involves attraction to sweat/saliva, so might not be the same thing at all...
[edit] idiot
what idiot redirected it from sweat fetish? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.35.213.226 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 23 March 2007.
